{"slug":"ai-adapt-docu-20261105","entry":{"slug":"ai-adapt-docu-20261105","title":"AI Adaptation Research Report — DOCU (DOCUSIGN, INC.) · WhiteSwan constituent","symbol":"DOCU","kind":"ai_adaptation","name":"DOCUSIGN, INC.","book":"AMF-WHITESWAN","direction":"long","verdict":"whiteswan","run_date":"2026-11-05","narrative":"deterministic","level":3,"aas":57.4,"date":"2026-11-05","generated_at":"2026-11-05T04:01:48+00:00","description":"DOCU (DOCUSIGN, INC.) is a WhiteSwan constituent: its own filings document AI inside the product or operations with investment behind it, and its AI Adaptation Score ranks at the top of the software companies (SIC 7370–7","algorithm_release":"1.1.0","rank":6,"composite":67.216,"story_score":54.08,"market":100.0,"weight":0.101042,"pinned":false},"url":"/marr/ai-adapt-docu-20261105","markdown":"# AI Adaptation Research Report — DOCU (DOCUSIGN, INC.) · WhiteSwan constituent\n\n*EventTrader research desk · generated 2026-11-05 04:01 UTC · report ai-adapt-docu-20261105 · narrative: built from the evidence pack by the platform*\n\n| | |\n|---|---|\n| **Company** | DOCU — DOCUSIGN, INC. · SIC 7372 Services-Prepackaged Software |\n| **Book** | AMF-WHITESWAN (long) — WhiteSwan |\n| **Composition algorithm** | Swan Composite v1.1.0 — 50% AI Adaptation Score + 25% AI Story Score + 25% market verdict, conviction-weighted |\n| **Anchor filing** | 10-Q filed 2026-09-04 (period 2026-07-31) |\n| **Adoption level** | 3 — integrated · model-confirmed |\n| **AI Adaptation Score** | 57.4 / 100 · run 2026-11-05 · sector software percentile 93.8 |\n| **Price** | 80.5 USD |\n| **Place in the book** | rank 6 of 10 · composite 67.2 · story 54.1 · market verdict 100.0 · weight 10.1% |\n\n## 1. Verdict\n\n- **DOCU (DOCUSIGN, INC.) is a WhiteSwan constituent**: its own filings document AI inside the product or operations with investment behind it, and its AI Adaptation Score ranks at the top of the software companies (SIC 7370–7379) on the 2026-11-05 run [S5].\n- The score rests on the company's 10-Q filed 2026-09-04, read in full by the platform's scorer [S1].\n- Adoption level **3 — integrated** on the 0–4 rubric, confirmed by a model read with credibility 3.0/10 [S1].\n- AI Adaptation Score **57.4** / 100, percentile 99.0 of 6503 scored filers and 93.8 within its sector (software, 585 filers) [S5].\n- What would move it: a next report that withdraws the deployments, investment or outcomes it now states [S1].\n\n## 2. The company\n\nDOCUSIGN, INC. files with the SEC under CIK 1261333, SIC 7372 (Services-Prepackaged Software), listed on Nasdaq [S4].\nThe filing the score reads is the 10-Q filed 2026-09-04 for the period ended 2026-07-31, effective for the books from 2026-09-07 [S2].\n\n## 3. What the filing says about AI\n\nThe scorer found 52 AI-related sentences in the 10-Q: 4 in the substantive sections (business, management's discussion) and 48 in the risk factors [S1].\nSignals counted in the substantive text: proprietary-model language 2, deployments 0, measured outcomes 0, investment 0, third-party vendor tools 0, exploratory language 0 [S1].\n\nVerbatim from the filing:\n\n> \"Docusign’s core offerings — our AI-native IAM platform, the world’s leading e-signature solution, and CLM solution — allow organizations to boost productivity, accelerate contract review cycles, and transform agreement data into insights and actions, while providing a customer-centric experience.\" — Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis [S1]\n> \"At Docusign, we have leveraged differentiated and large-scale proprietary data, built an expansive ecosystem of integrations with leading AI providers, and developed AI solutions that operate at enterprise scale.\" — Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis [S1]\n> \"Even if we successfully create, market and sell AI-based offerings that meet customer demand, the costs of developing and operating such solutions (including initial training costs and ongoing processing and inference costs) may reduce profitability and adversely affect our results of operations.\" — Item 1A. Risk Factors [S1]\n> \"We may also face greater competition from non-specialist solutions relying on generic large language models (“LLMs”), generative AI and general-purpose agents to address a broad range of business needs.\" — Item 1A. Risk Factors [S1]\n> \"As we attempt to sell our products and solutions to new and existing customers, we must convince them that our products and solutions are superior to other solutions available to their organizations, including generic LLMs, software created using natural language prompts and generative AI (referred to as vibe coding) and other emerging technologies.\" — Item 1A. Risk Factors [S1]\n> \"Finally, the AI models we develop may not perform as expected when deployed, which could lead to financial losses or harm our competitive position.\" — Item 1A. Risk Factors [S1]\n> \"A number of jurisdictions, including many U.S. states such as California and Colorado, have proposed or enacted laws regarding automated decision‑making, algorithmic discrimination and so called “high‑risk” AI technologies (mandating, among other provisions, requirements for risk management, impact assessments, consumer notices and human oversight), which may impact our use of AI and AI-powered tools.\" — Item 1A. Risk Factors [S1]\n> \"In addition, updates to models, prompts, training data, or agent orchestration may cause previously tested workflows to behave differently or produce inconsistent results, making it more difficult to detect regressions and ensure compliance with customer requirements and applicable laws.For example, any integration of third-party AI functionality with our products and solutions relies on safeguards implemented by the third-party developers of the underlying AI models, including those related to the accuracy, bias, and other variables of the data, and these safeguards may be insufficient.\" — Item 1A. Risk Factors [S1]\n> \"AI technologies can be complex and are rapidly evolving, and while we believe that product features powered by next generation AI technologies, such as generative AI, will help drive the future growth of our business, there is no guarantee that such new product features will ultimately be successful.\" — Item 1A. Risk Factors [S1]\n> \"Furthermore, we are increasingly developing and deploying agentic AI workflows and autonomous agents designed to perform tasks and make decisions with limited human intervention.\" — Item 1A. Risk Factors [S1]\n\n## 4. The AI Adaptation Score\n\nThe AI Adaptation Score weighs the adoption level (0–4) at 45%, building with AI from the ground up (greenfield) at 20%, the credibility of the claims at 15%, the trajectory against the previous filing at 12% and the investment signal at 8%, with trajectory and investment measured against the company's own sector; the greenfield reward counts only from level 3 upward [S5].\nDOCU's score of 57.4 decomposes into level 33.8, greenfield 10.0, credibility 4.5, trajectory 5.6 and investment 3.5 points [S5].\nIts cluster label for the run is **builder** with a margin of 26.6 points from the sector's other cluster [S5].\n\nThe model read of the filing returned level 3 (integrated) with confidence 0.62 and sub-scores product 7.0, operations 3.0, investment 3.0, data moat 6.0, credibility 3.0, greenfield 5.0 (each 0–10) [S1].\nIts summary: \"Docusign markets an AI-native IAM platform with proprietary agreement data, agentic workflows, third-party model integrations, and a 2024 AI acquisition (Lexion). AI is embedded in core products with a described data asset, but outcomes are qualitative and spend is unquantified, limiting credibility.\" [S1].\n> \"At Docusign, we have leveraged differentiated and large-scale proprietary data, built an expansive ecosystem of integrations with leading AI providers, and developed AI solutions that operate at enterprise scale.\" — Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis [S1]\n> \"Our second priority is to expand our AI data and innovation advantage through IAM as the orchestration layer for agreements.\" — Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis [S1]\n> \"We are also making further investments in expanding AI capabilities in our products and solutions.\" — Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis [S1]\n\n## 5. Trajectory\n\nThe previous periodic report, the 10-Q filed 2026-06-05, scored level 1 (exploring) with 49 AI sentences [S3].\nThe level rose by 2 between the two reports [S1].\n\n## 6. Recent developments\n\n- wire:prnewswire 2026-11-04T16:00+00:00: Docusign Named a Leader in the 2026-2027 IDC MarketScape for Worldwide Contract Life-Cycle Management Software for Corporate Legal [S7]\n- wire:prnewswire 2026-11-03T14:00+00:00: Docusign Acquires Suplari to Accelerate AI-Powered Contract Management for Procurement [S8]\n- wire:prnewswire 2026-10-26T08:00+00:00: Docusign Intelligent Agreement Management to Be Sold as SAP Solution Extensions [S9]\n- wire:prnewswire_financial 2026-10-21T13:49+00:00: DossDocs Launches New MyPortal Early Disclosures with Built-In Docusign® eSignature and Lower Upfront Doc Costs [S10]\n- wire:prnewswire 2026-10-13T15:00+00:00: Docusign and Salesforce Launch Intelligent Agreement Management Natively Across Salesforce to Power Agentic Agreement Workflows [S11]\n- wire:prnewswire 2026-10-08T15:00+00:00: Docusign Introduces PDF Editor to Simplify the Path from Document Preparation to Signature [S12]\n\n## 7. What would change the verdict\n\nDOCU leaves the long book if a later report drops the deployments, investment or outcomes it now states, if the model read judges the claims uncredible, or if higher-scoring filers displace it on a later run [S5].\nThe book is recomposed on every scoring run from the ten highest scores that pass the liquidity screen [S5].\n\n## 8. Risks and caveats\n\nThe score reads what the company discloses, not what it does: a company can adopt AI without describing it in a periodic report, and can describe it without adopting it [S5].\nRisk-factor language is counted separately from substantive text and never credited as adoption; boilerplate that resembles generic risk disclosure is excluded [S5].\nOnly the sections the scorer parses are read (business, risk factors, management's discussion for a 10-K or 10-Q; the earnings release of an 8-K is scored but never anchors a level) [S5].\n\n## 9. Watch list\n\n- The next periodic report of DOCU (expected around 2026-12-03) and its AI sentences [S4].\n- The model read of the current filing (done) [S5].\n- The next scoring run's AI Adaptation Score and the book's recomposition [S5].\n## Place in the book\n\n- Rank 6 of 10 in AMF-WHITESWAN (Swan Composite v1.1.0, scoring run 2026-11-05): the book holds the highest composites [S5].\n- Composite: 0.50 × 57.4 (AAS) + 0.25 × 54.1 (story) + 0.25 × 100.0 (market) = 67.2 [S5].\n- Market verdict 100.0: over the last 90 days DOCU rose more and fell less than the software universe's median daily return (down-capture 0.81, up-capture 3.28, L = 2.47; 32 down / 19 up days) — the Failure-To-Adapt fund's selection signal, 50 = moves with the software universe's median daily return [S5].\n- AI Story Score 54.1: a beneficiary narrative in the AI stories written about the company [S5].\n- Weight: rank factor 1.44 (rank 6 of 10) × story factor 1.04 × market factor 1.50, normalised across the book and clamped to 5–20% → 10.1% [S5].\n\n## Sources\n\n- **S1** — DOCU 10-Q filed 2026-09-04 — SEC primary document (the anchor filing the score reads) — \n- **S2** — EDGAR filing index for accession 0001261333-26-000099 — \n- **S3** — DOCU 10-Q filed 2026-06-05 — the previous periodic report (trajectory) — \n- **S4** — SEC EDGAR company submissions — DOCUSIGN, INC. (CIK 1261333) — \n- **S5** — EventTrader AI Adaptation Score, scoring run 2026-11-05 — the AMF-WHITESWAN fund page (method, composition) — \n- **S6** — EventTrader real-price feed — DOCU quote — \n- **S7** — Headline — wire:prnewswire 2026-11-04T16:00+00:00: Docusign Named a Leader in the 2026-2027 IDC MarketScape for Worldwide Contract Life-Cycle Management Software for Corporate Legal — \n- **S8** — Headline — wire:prnewswire 2026-11-03T14:00+00:00: Docusign Acquires Suplari to Accelerate AI-Powered Contract Management for Procurement — \n- **S9** — Headline — wire:prnewswire 2026-10-26T08:00+00:00: Docusign Intelligent Agreement Management to Be Sold as SAP Solution Extensions — \n- **S10** — Headline — wire:prnewswire_financial 2026-10-21T13:49+00:00: DossDocs Launches New MyPortal Early Disclosures with Built-In Docusign® eSignature and Lower Upfront Doc Costs — \n- **S11** — Headline — wire:prnewswire 2026-10-13T15:00+00:00: Docusign and Salesforce Launch Intelligent Agreement Management Natively Across Salesforce to Power Agentic Agreement Workflows — \n- **S12** — Headline — wire:prnewswire 2026-10-08T15:00+00:00: Docusign Introduces PDF Editor to Simplify the Path from Document Preparation to Signature — \n\n## Method and disclaimer\n\nThe AI Adaptation Score reads each company's own periodic SEC reports (10-K, 10-Q, 20-F, 40-F): deterministic features (AI sentences by section, proprietary-model, deployment, outcome, investment and vendor language, boilerplate and negation excluded) set an adoption level on a 0–4 rubric; a model read of the filing's AI sentences confirms the level and scores credibility and greenfield (the business built with AI from the ground up rather than retrofitted); the score combines level, greenfield, credibility, trajectory against the previous report and investment, measured against the company's sector, with greenfield carrying the highest reward. The books are composed by Swan Composite v1.1.0: each company's composite is 50% AI Adaptation Score + 25% AI Story Score + 25% market verdict — the AI Story Score is the sentiment of the AI stories written about it, the belief network of companies named in the same stories and the price reaction to those stories (no story scores neutral); the market verdict is the Failure-To-Adapt fund's selection signal, the signed down/up capture ratio of the stock against the software universe's median return over 90 days (a stock that falls more and rises less than its peers scores below 50). AMF-BLACKSWAN holds the ten lowest composites that pass the liquidity screen and the new-listing gate and AMF-WHITESWAN the ten highest, weighted by conviction (rank, story agreement and market agreement, each leg 5–20%), recomposed on every scoring run. Every quote in this report is the filing's text verbatim; every factual sentence names its source; a source the platform could not reach is reported as missing, never filled in.\n\n*This report is information, not investment advice. Figures come from the cited sources as of their dates. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any asset.*\n","html":"

AI Adaptation Research Report — DOCU (DOCUSIGN, INC.) · WhiteSwan constituent

\n

EventTrader research desk · generated 2026-11-05 04:01 UTC · report ai-adapt-docu-20261105 · narrative: built from the evidence pack by the platform

\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
CompanyDOCU — DOCUSIGN, INC. · SIC 7372 Services-Prepackaged Software
BookAMF-WHITESWAN (long) — WhiteSwan
Composition algorithmSwan Composite v1.1.0 — 50% AI Adaptation Score + 25% AI Story Score + 25% market verdict, conviction-weighted
Anchor filing10-Q filed 2026-09-04 (period 2026-07-31)
Adoption level3 — integrated · model-confirmed
AI Adaptation Score57.4 / 100 · run 2026-11-05 · sector software percentile 93.8
Price80.5 USD
Place in the bookrank 6 of 10 · composite 67.2 · story 54.1 · market verdict 100.0 · weight 10.1%
\n

1. Verdict

\n
    \n
  • DOCU (DOCUSIGN, INC.) is a WhiteSwan constituent: its own filings document AI inside the product or operations with investment behind it, and its AI Adaptation Score ranks at the top of the software companies (SIC 7370–7379) on the 2026-11-05 run [S5].
    • \n
  • The score rests on the company's 10-Q filed 2026-09-04, read in full by the platform's scorer [S1].
    • \n
  • Adoption level 3 — integrated on the 0–4 rubric, confirmed by a model read with credibility 3.0/10 [S1].
    • \n
  • AI Adaptation Score 57.4 / 100, percentile 99.0 of 6503 scored filers and 93.8 within its sector (software, 585 filers) [S5].
    • \n
  • What would move it: a next report that withdraws the deployments, investment or outcomes it now states [S1].
    • \n
\n

2. The company

\n

DOCUSIGN, INC. files with the SEC under CIK 1261333, SIC 7372 (Services-Prepackaged Software), listed on Nasdaq [S4].\nThe filing the score reads is the 10-Q filed 2026-09-04 for the period ended 2026-07-31, effective for the books from 2026-09-07 [S2].

\n

3. What the filing says about AI

\n

The scorer found 52 AI-related sentences in the 10-Q: 4 in the substantive sections (business, management's discussion) and 48 in the risk factors [S1].\nSignals counted in the substantive text: proprietary-model language 2, deployments 0, measured outcomes 0, investment 0, third-party vendor tools 0, exploratory language 0 [S1].

\n

Verbatim from the filing:

\n
\n

\"Docusign’s core offerings — our AI-native IAM platform, the world’s leading e-signature solution, and CLM solution — allow organizations to boost productivity, accelerate contract review cycles, and transform agreement data into insights and actions, while providing a customer-centric experience.\" — Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis [S1]\n\"At Docusign, we have leveraged differentiated and large-scale proprietary data, built an expansive ecosystem of integrations with leading AI providers, and developed AI solutions that operate at enterprise scale.\" — Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis [S1]\n\"Even if we successfully create, market and sell AI-based offerings that meet customer demand, the costs of developing and operating such solutions (including initial training costs and ongoing processing and inference costs) may reduce profitability and adversely affect our results of operations.\" — Item 1A. Risk Factors [S1]\n\"We may also face greater competition from non-specialist solutions relying on generic large language models (“LLMs”), generative AI and general-purpose agents to address a broad range of business needs.\" — Item 1A. Risk Factors [S1]\n\"As we attempt to sell our products and solutions to new and existing customers, we must convince them that our products and solutions are superior to other solutions available to their organizations, including generic LLMs, software created using natural language prompts and generative AI (referred to as vibe coding) and other emerging technologies.\" — Item 1A. Risk Factors [S1]\n\"Finally, the AI models we develop may not perform as expected when deployed, which could lead to financial losses or harm our competitive position.\" — Item 1A. Risk Factors [S1]\n\"A number of jurisdictions, including many U.S. states such as California and Colorado, have proposed or enacted laws regarding automated decision‑making, algorithmic discrimination and so called “high‑risk” AI technologies (mandating, among other provisions, requirements for risk management, impact assessments, consumer notices and human oversight), which may impact our use of AI and AI-powered tools.\" — Item 1A. Risk Factors [S1]\n\"In addition, updates to models, prompts, training data, or agent orchestration may cause previously tested workflows to behave differently or produce inconsistent results, making it more difficult to detect regressions and ensure compliance with customer requirements and applicable laws.For example, any integration of third-party AI functionality with our products and solutions relies on safeguards implemented by the third-party developers of the underlying AI models, including those related to the accuracy, bias, and other variables of the data, and these safeguards may be insufficient.\" — Item 1A. Risk Factors [S1]\n\"AI technologies can be complex and are rapidly evolving, and while we believe that product features powered by next generation AI technologies, such as generative AI, will help drive the future growth of our business, there is no guarantee that such new product features will ultimately be successful.\" — Item 1A. Risk Factors [S1]\n\"Furthermore, we are increasingly developing and deploying agentic AI workflows and autonomous agents designed to perform tasks and make decisions with limited human intervention.\" — Item 1A. Risk Factors [S1]

\n
\n

4. The AI Adaptation Score

\n

The AI Adaptation Score weighs the adoption level (0–4) at 45%, building with AI from the ground up (greenfield) at 20%, the credibility of the claims at 15%, the trajectory against the previous filing at 12% and the investment signal at 8%, with trajectory and investment measured against the company's own sector; the greenfield reward counts only from level 3 upward [S5].\nDOCU's score of 57.4 decomposes into level 33.8, greenfield 10.0, credibility 4.5, trajectory 5.6 and investment 3.5 points [S5].\nIts cluster label for the run is builder with a margin of 26.6 points from the sector's other cluster [S5].

\n

The model read of the filing returned level 3 (integrated) with confidence 0.62 and sub-scores product 7.0, operations 3.0, investment 3.0, data moat 6.0, credibility 3.0, greenfield 5.0 (each 0–10) [S1].\nIts summary: \"Docusign markets an AI-native IAM platform with proprietary agreement data, agentic workflows, third-party model integrations, and a 2024 AI acquisition (Lexion). AI is embedded in core products with a described data asset, but outcomes are qualitative and spend is unquantified, limiting credibility.\" [S1].

\n
\n

\"At Docusign, we have leveraged differentiated and large-scale proprietary data, built an expansive ecosystem of integrations with leading AI providers, and developed AI solutions that operate at enterprise scale.\" — Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis [S1]\n\"Our second priority is to expand our AI data and innovation advantage through IAM as the orchestration layer for agreements.\" — Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis [S1]\n\"We are also making further investments in expanding AI capabilities in our products and solutions.\" — Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis [S1]

\n
\n

5. Trajectory

\n

The previous periodic report, the 10-Q filed 2026-06-05, scored level 1 (exploring) with 49 AI sentences [S3].\nThe level rose by 2 between the two reports [S1].

\n

6. Recent developments

\n
    \n
  • wire:prnewswire 2026-11-04T16:00+00:00: Docusign Named a Leader in the 2026-2027 IDC MarketScape for Worldwide Contract Life-Cycle Management Software for Corporate Legal [S7]
    • \n
  • wire:prnewswire 2026-11-03T14:00+00:00: Docusign Acquires Suplari to Accelerate AI-Powered Contract Management for Procurement [S8]
    • \n
  • wire:prnewswire 2026-10-26T08:00+00:00: Docusign Intelligent Agreement Management to Be Sold as SAP Solution Extensions [S9]
    • \n
  • wire:prnewswire_financial 2026-10-21T13:49+00:00: DossDocs Launches New MyPortal Early Disclosures with Built-In Docusign® eSignature and Lower Upfront Doc Costs [S10]
    • \n
  • wire:prnewswire 2026-10-13T15:00+00:00: Docusign and Salesforce Launch Intelligent Agreement Management Natively Across Salesforce to Power Agentic Agreement Workflows [S11]
    • \n
  • wire:prnewswire 2026-10-08T15:00+00:00: Docusign Introduces PDF Editor to Simplify the Path from Document Preparation to Signature [S12]
    • \n
\n

7. What would change the verdict

\n

DOCU leaves the long book if a later report drops the deployments, investment or outcomes it now states, if the model read judges the claims uncredible, or if higher-scoring filers displace it on a later run [S5].\nThe book is recomposed on every scoring run from the ten highest scores that pass the liquidity screen [S5].

\n

8. Risks and caveats

\n

The score reads what the company discloses, not what it does: a company can adopt AI without describing it in a periodic report, and can describe it without adopting it [S5].\nRisk-factor language is counted separately from substantive text and never credited as adoption; boilerplate that resembles generic risk disclosure is excluded [S5].\nOnly the sections the scorer parses are read (business, risk factors, management's discussion for a 10-K or 10-Q; the earnings release of an 8-K is scored but never anchors a level) [S5].

\n

9. Watch list

\n
    \n
  • The next periodic report of DOCU (expected around 2026-12-03) and its AI sentences [S4].
    • \n
  • The model read of the current filing (done) [S5].
    • \n
  • The next scoring run's AI Adaptation Score and the book's recomposition [S5].
    • \n
\n

Place in the book

\n
    \n
  • Rank 6 of 10 in AMF-WHITESWAN (Swan Composite v1.1.0, scoring run 2026-11-05): the book holds the highest composites [S5].
    • \n
  • Composite: 0.50 × 57.4 (AAS) + 0.25 × 54.1 (story) + 0.25 × 100.0 (market) = 67.2 [S5].
    • \n
  • Market verdict 100.0: over the last 90 days DOCU rose more and fell less than the software universe's median daily return (down-capture 0.81, up-capture 3.28, L = 2.47; 32 down / 19 up days) — the Failure-To-Adapt fund's selection signal, 50 = moves with the software universe's median daily return [S5].
    • \n
  • AI Story Score 54.1: a beneficiary narrative in the AI stories written about the company [S5].
    • \n
  • Weight: rank factor 1.44 (rank 6 of 10) × story factor 1.04 × market factor 1.50, normalised across the book and clamped to 5–20% → 10.1% [S5].
    • \n
\n

Sources

\n\n

Method and disclaimer

\n

The AI Adaptation Score reads each company's own periodic SEC reports (10-K, 10-Q, 20-F, 40-F): deterministic features (AI sentences by section, proprietary-model, deployment, outcome, investment and vendor language, boilerplate and negation excluded) set an adoption level on a 0–4 rubric; a model read of the filing's AI sentences confirms the level and scores credibility and greenfield (the business built with AI from the ground up rather than retrofitted); the score combines level, greenfield, credibility, trajectory against the previous report and investment, measured against the company's sector, with greenfield carrying the highest reward. The books are composed by Swan Composite v1.1.0: each company's composite is 50% AI Adaptation Score + 25% AI Story Score + 25% market verdict — the AI Story Score is the sentiment of the AI stories written about it, the belief network of companies named in the same stories and the price reaction to those stories (no story scores neutral); the market verdict is the Failure-To-Adapt fund's selection signal, the signed down/up capture ratio of the stock against the software universe's median return over 90 days (a stock that falls more and rises less than its peers scores below 50). AMF-BLACKSWAN holds the ten lowest composites that pass the liquidity screen and the new-listing gate and AMF-WHITESWAN the ten highest, weighted by conviction (rank, story agreement and market agreement, each leg 5–20%), recomposed on every scoring run. Every quote in this report is the filing's text verbatim; every factual sentence names its source; a source the platform could not reach is reported as missing, never filled in.

\n

This report is information, not investment advice. Figures come from the cited sources as of their dates. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any asset.

\n"}